Wednesday, February 1, 2023
Cannabis Legal News
  • Home
  • Legalization
  • State Laws
  • Federal Law
  • International
  • Testing
  • Expungement
  • Cannabis Capitalism
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Legalization
  • State Laws
  • Federal Law
  • International
  • Testing
  • Expungement
  • Cannabis Capitalism
No Result
View All Result
Cannabis Legal News
No Result
View All Result
Home Legalization

Judge hears arguments over impact fees paid to city by cannabis shop |

cannalegal by cannalegal
November 26, 2022
in Legalization
0
585
SHARES
3.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

HAVERHILL — Essex Superior Courtroom Choose James Lang heard arguments earlier this month from the lawyer for Haverhill Stem — a marijuana store — in help of its lawsuit towards Mayor James Fiorentini and town of Haverhill over town’s assortment of group affect charges paid by Stem, with out the documentation Stem says is required by state legislation.

The choose additionally heard from town’s lawyer, who defended town’s assortment of the charges. 

You might also like

Weekday Wrap: Umatilla tribes legalize cannabis possession on their land

FDA asks Congress to legislate CBD approval pathway, as new law permits marijuana & CBD research

NewsMunchies Celebrates 10 Years – NewsMunchies

After listening to almost two hours of argument in Essex Superior Courtroom in Newburyport, Lang stated he would take it underneath advisement and rule at a later date, which is frequent for abstract judgment motions courtroom officers stated. The choose is predicted to resolve the case or ship it to trial.

In its go well with towards the mayor and town for abstract judgement, Stem, which is owned by Caroline Pineau, is looking for a ruling that Haverhill can not acquire affect charges that don’t adjust to the state legislation and the return of all affect charges paid to Haverhill to this point, plus curiosity and lawyer’s charges totaling greater than $750,000 in addition to a renegotiation of Stem’s Host Group Settlement with town as required underneath the newly revised hashish legal guidelines. 

Pineau is arguing that in accordance to the legislation and her Host Group Settlement, town should doc particularly what prices it has incurred because of Stem’s operation and that town has each didn’t doc these prices and that no such prices are fairly associated to Stem’s operation.

Pineau’s lawyer, Thomas MacMillan, stated the brand new legislation requires a group to stipulate precise prices not “anticipated” prices, and that prior documentation produced by Haverhill that was ready by a consulting agency employed by town will not be correct documentation and doesn’t hyperlink the alleged prices to Stem’s operations. 

“They took over $700,000 with out saying what it was for,” MacMillan stated.

Lang stated the state’s Hashish Management Fee has not clarified what bills affect charges must be used however {that a} group can use the funds because it sees match so long as the prices are fairly associated to the affect a hashish operation has on a group. 

“The query stays if the data within the report is adequate,” Lang stated. “I am unable to inform what the correct prices or anticipated prices are. It isn’t clear to me.” 

The town’s lawyer, Michele Randazzo, stated town is engaged on a brand new affect price report and town will probably be hiring a distinct advisor to create it. 

On Sept. 16, Essex Superior Courtroom Choose Janice Howe issued a call in Stem’s case that partially rejected a request by town to have the lawsuit dismissed, however allowed the underlying dispute relating to affect charges to maneuver ahead — permitting Stem to hunt abstract judgement and ask a choose to rule upfront of a trial.

The panorama relating to hashish operator affect charges have modified since a brand new legislation was signed by Gov. Charlie Baker in August giving state’s Hashish Management Fee the authority to assessment and monitor Host Group Agreements and require help documentation by their host communities.  

The legislation, which went into impact Nov. 9, applies to hashish operators looking for a brand new license or annual renewal of a license to function. 

Since 2017, the state has allowed communities to gather affect charges from hashish sellers that have to be “fairly associated” to prices imposed upon the group and is capped at not more than 3% of the product sales of the institution. The legislation additionally permits host communities the choice of charging hashish operations excise taxes as much as 3% on retail gross sales.

The previous legislation allowed affect charges to be in impact for 5 years whereas the brand new legislation expands that to eight years from the date a hashish enterprise receives its last license from the CCC. 

Underneath the brand new legislation, if a licensed hashish operator believes the fee info supplied by the host group will not be fairly associated to the precise prices imposed on the group, the operator could convey a breach of contract civil motion towards the host group to get better damages, lawyer charges and different prices. 

It was famous through the listening to that town of Boston not too long ago grew to become the primary group within the state to refund thousands and thousands of {dollars} in affect charges to hashish sellers.  

A letter despatched to Boston’s hashish operators on Nov. 3 from Mayor Michelle Wu’s administration famous town will not acquire group affect charges and can return all group affect charges collected to this point. It was reported these refunds quantity to $2.86 million. The letter additionally indicated town reserves the fitting to gather these charges sooner or later as permitted underneath the legislation.



Source link

Previous Post

Opinion: Marijuana is not freedom – Idaho State Journal

Next Post

DEA Legalizes Cocaine Derivative, Rejects Pot Comparisons

cannalegal

cannalegal

Related Posts

Legalization

Weekday Wrap: Umatilla tribes legalize cannabis possession on their land

by cannalegal
January 31, 2023
Legalization

FDA asks Congress to legislate CBD approval pathway, as new law permits marijuana & CBD research

by cannalegal
January 31, 2023
Legalization

NewsMunchies Celebrates 10 Years – NewsMunchies

by Ted Corless
January 31, 2023
Legalization

Hong Kong Cannabis: Bad News for CBD

by Fred Rocafort
January 30, 2023
Legalization

Pa. bill would loosen rules on prescribing medical marijuana – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

by cannalegal
January 30, 2023
Next Post

DEA Legalizes Cocaine Derivative, Rejects Pot Comparisons

Recommended

Cannabis Packaging and Logistics Company, DIZPOT, Backs Missouri Adult-Use Legalization Campaign in CEO’s Home State

October 13, 2022

USDA Launches First-Of-Its-Kind Weekly Hemp Market Report To Support Evolving Industry

January 26, 2023

Categories

  • Cannabis Capitalism
  • Expungement
  • Federal Law
  • International
  • Legalization
  • State Laws
  • Testing

Don't miss it

Testing

FDA asks Congress to legislate CBD approval pathway, as new law permits marijuana & CBD research – FDA determines food and dietary supplement framework is inappropriate for CBD products | Hogan Lovells

January 31, 2023
Expungement

D.C. Mayor Signs Major Medical Marijuana Expansion Bill, Eliminating Licensing Caps, Providing Tax Relief And More

January 31, 2023
Legalization

Weekday Wrap: Umatilla tribes legalize cannabis possession on their land

January 31, 2023
State Laws

Omaha police fatally shoot armed man in Target store

January 31, 2023
Federal Law

10th Circuit: Thanks, but no thanks on Justice Thomas’ pot statement | Courts

January 31, 2023
International

Homegrow bill introduced in Washington House

January 31, 2023

Recent News

FDA asks Congress to legislate CBD approval pathway, as new law permits marijuana & CBD research – FDA determines food and dietary supplement framework is inappropriate for CBD products | Hogan Lovells

January 31, 2023

D.C. Mayor Signs Major Medical Marijuana Expansion Bill, Eliminating Licensing Caps, Providing Tax Relief And More

January 31, 2023

Weekday Wrap: Umatilla tribes legalize cannabis possession on their land

January 31, 2023

Categories

  • Cannabis Capitalism
  • Expungement
  • Federal Law
  • International
  • Legalization
  • State Laws
  • Testing

Contact Us

  • Privacy & Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Copyright Cannabis Legal News

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Legalization
  • State Laws
  • Federal Law
  • International
  • Testing
  • Expungement
  • Cannabis Capitalism

© 2021 Copyright Cannabis Legal News